• Following Us

  • Categories

  • Check out the Archives









  • Awards & Nominations

Doctor Who: The Interstellar Song Contest (Review)

“Did I just fly through space on a confetti cannon?”

“Yeah.”

“Camp.”

The Interstellar Song Contest is a very strange episode of Doctor Who, both inside and outside the narrative.

Internally, there is a surprising tension within the episode, which is transparently Die Hard at Eurovision.” This is an inherently camp premise. It is, in classic Doctor Who tradition, a “frock” premise. It is goofy, silly, and inherent queer-coded. However, once the episode gets moving, it shifts gears into something much darker and more intense; this is an episode which opens with the audience blown into space, weaves through genocide and builds to a sequence of the Doctor sadistically torturing the villain. The episode balances on a tonal knife-edge.

Spaced out.

However, there is also an uncomfortable tension in the air around The Interstellar Song Contest, a story that was conceived and written two years ago, intended to air on the night of Eurovision, and which was obviously intended as a criticism of consumptive capitalism, but which takes on a lot more weight by simple virtue of the events that have unfolded in the time between when the episode was commissioned and when it was broadcast. The Interstellar Song Contest is an episode is watched in a different context than it was made, despite being ostensibly tailored for this moment.

The result is a deeply fascinating and unsettling episode of television, one that demonstrates both the urgency and the immediacy of television as a medium, but which also illustrates the risks that come with that.

Tune in.

Continue reading

Doctor Who: The Story and the Engine (Review)

“A beating heart inside a brain?”

“Brilliant. What else is a story?”

The Story and the Engine marks a clear return to form for the season around it.

Once again, it is interesting that Davies’ return to Doctor Who has adopted its own structures and rhythms, so that these two eight-episode seasons are more obviously paired with one another than with the thirteen-episode seasons of his first tenure. The Robot Revolution and Space Babies were retrofuturist pastiches, Lux and The Devil’s Chord were formally ambitious attempts to do something new with the format, The Well and Boom were militaristic high-concept science-fiction, Lucky Day and 73 Yards were Ruby-centric stories about encroaching fascism.

Tree’s company.

The Story and the Engine is an interesting companion piece to Dot and Bubble, in that both episodes are – at their core – stories about what it means for the Doctor to be a person of colour. Within their respective seasons, The Story and the Engine and Dot and Bubble are both constructed as stories that simply could not work if the Doctor still looked like David Tennant, Jodie Whittaker or Peter Capaldi. While Dot and Bubble cleverly built to this concept as a twist, The Story and the Engine makes it clear from the opening scenes.

The Story and the Engine is a clever, thoughtful meditation on what it means that the Doctor now looks like Ncuti Gatwa. It’s well-observed, well-structured and well-written, a classic Doctor Who story told from a fresh angle.

A cut above?

Continue reading

Doctor Who: The Well (Review)

“There’s still hope.”

“Hope is irrelevant.”

The Well is a strange and triumphant exercise, a collection of contradictions that coheres remarkably well.

It is a chamber piece, a very basic Doctor Who story that could easily have been executed on the classic BBC budget, blown up with Disney+ money. It is a very obvious sequel to at least one beloved story from Davies’ original tenure as showrunner, and saturated with references to others, while still feeling undeniably like a produce of his second era overseeing the show. It is an exercise in nostalgia, but also a story about how that nostalgia is cursed. It is also Russell T. Davies revisiting his early work, while taking cues from Steven Moffat.

All’s well…

It shouldn’t work. The Well should collapse under its own weight. It should feel like an indulgent mess, a collection of clashing recycled imagery and iconography. However, The Well manages to strike a very careful balance between its competing priorities, allowing the individual elements to add up to more than the sum of its individual parts. It’s an episode that feels like an extension of Davies work in both The Robot Revolution and Lux, solidifying a rich thematic vein running through the first three stories of the season.

The Well is a remarkable accomplishment.

Spaced out…

Continue reading

Doctor Who: Lux (Review)

“And tell me, how did you enter this world?”

“I’m a two-dimensional character, you can’t expect backstory.”

There has been a lot of discussion about the reduction in the number of episodes of Doctor Who produced within a year. These discussions are often alarmist in nature, and framed in some sort of despairing lament about how the show is not what it once was. However, there is less discussion about how this compression of the show affects its format.

While Davies can be a chaotic writer within individual episodes, particular rushing towards a climactic resolution to a story or a season, he has always had a very vision of the structure of a given season of Doctor Who. Both of Davies’ successors, Steven Moffat and Chris Chibnall, experimented with different season structures.

Ring-a-Ding-Ding…

Moffat’s fifth season was structured identical to the previous four, and then his sixth season was structured as an inversion of that – opening with an epic two-parter, closing with a single run-around episode. His seventh season was all stand-alone episodes, while his ninth season was comprised primarily of two-parters, most of which adopted an interesting approach to the basic structure of a two-parter.

Chibnall’s first season was comprised entirely of standalone and disconnected episodes, with the Stenza serving as recurring antagonists. Chibnall’s second season was much more arc-focused, opening and closing with two big two-part adventures, with The Timeless Children rewriting the show’s lore. Chibnall’s third season was a single narrative spread across six episodes, Doctor Who: Flux.

An animated discussion.

However, Davies had a structural formula and he largely stuck to it. Davies’ seasons often opened with triptych of present-past-future stories to orient new viewers in the world of Doctor Who, before leading into a toyetic monster two-parter. This would be followed later in the season by a more high-brow two-parter, and then a two-part season finale that had been seeded through the season to that point. Davies adhered rigidly to that structure.

That structure worked within the confines of thirteen-episode seasons, but obviously cannot be applied to an eight-episode season. After all, just counting through the “obligatory” episodes within that structure eats up nine of the season’s episodes. So Davies has had to come up with a new structure for the show’s seasons. Space Babies and The Robot Revolution effectively compress those opening three episodes into a single story, while The Devil’s Chord and Lux suggest an entirely new narrative archetype.

The next stage of the show…

There is some online debate about whether Davies is repeating himself, whether his approach to Doctor Who is meaningfully different now than it was twenty years ago. While it’s easy to focus on the places where Davies’ writing is similar – notably the premieres and the finales – it is also worth acknowledging where it is different. The Devil’s Chord and Lux are two episodes that are of a piece with one another, two episodes as similar to one another as Rise of the Cybermen and The Age of Steel are to The Sontaran Stratagem and The Poison Sky, fitting within Davies’ season structure.

However, they are also new and exciting. They are a type of episode that is fundamentally different from anything that Davies even attempted during his first tenure as showrunner. Indeed, they are fundamentally different from anything that Moffat and Chibnall attempted as well. They are big, bold and self-aware. They represent a clear evolution of what is possible on Doctor Who. If nothing else, they prove the show is still alive – that it is still animated.

Rave about this episode until you are blue in the face…

Continue reading

Doctor Who: The Robot Revolution (Review)

“I’m saying no.”

“With regret, your powers are only nominal.”

“Why is it all so mad? Why is everything on this planet so stupid?”

One of the interesting consequences of the relatively compressed modern season of Doctor Who is the way that it collides episodes into one another.

With only eight episodes in a given season, there isn’t room for the sort of structure that Davies brought to his first four years overseeing Doctor Who, when he would reintroduce the show to audiences each year with a triptych that opened in the present and followed with a celebrity historical and a futuristic science-fiction episode. Rose gave way to The End of the World and The Unquiet DeadSmith and Jones led into The Shakespeare Code and Gridlock. Partners in Crime fed into The Fires of Pompeii and Planet of the Ood. Davies’ second season was the exception, opening with New Earth and Tooth and Claw, but that was notably the only one of Davies’ four seasons that didn’t have to open with the introduction of a new companion, with The Christmas Invasion having introduced the Tenth Doctor.

Extending its reach.

The Robot Revolution is put in the awkward position of having to combine the typical Davies season opener that introduces Belinda Chandra as a companion but also being Davies’ big high-concept pseudo-political idiosyncratic science-fiction story like Gridlock or Planet of the Ood. The result is a strange cocktail, that doesn’t quite cohere but is nevertheless compelling. For all the criticism of Davies’ return as showrunner, his second tenure does not lack for ambition and ideas. The Robot Revolution is bursting with concepts and thoughts, with Davies eager to scream his ideas at the loudest possible volume. The Robot Revolution is, in typical Davies style, incredibly maximalist in its storytelling. It brushes past plot points and ideas with reckless abandon and breathless enthusiasm.

Whatever the episode’s flaws, it’s certainly not the product of assembly line production.

The march of progress…

Continue reading

New Escapist Column! On Ncuti Gatwa’s Casting in “Doctor Who”…

I published a new piece at The Escapist yesterday. This weekend saw the surprise announcement of Ncuti Gatwa’s casting as the new lead of Doctor Who, so it seemed like a good opportunity to make sense of it.

Gatwa is an interesting choice, and marks something of a departure from the recent casting of older and more established actors with more conventional prestige, like Peter Capaldi and Jodie Whittaker. Capaldi and Whittaker were both choices that spoke very much to an older audience with more mature and perhaps conventional taste. In contrast, Gatwa’s casting suggests that new showrunner Russell T. Davies is pushing the show towards a younger audience, that rather than trying to appease or flatter older fans, Davies might be trying to attract new ones.

You can read the piece here, or click the picture below.