• Following Us

  • Categories

  • Check out the Archives

  • Awards & Nominations

An Evening With David Cronenberg…

The University Philosophical Society of Trinity College Dublin hosted an interview with David Cronenberg, the self-proclaimed “baron of blood” last night. I was honoured to be invited to attend (one of the perks of being an old hack, I suppose – I even got to dine with him beforehand) and it was a great informative evening for my inner film buff, as well as anybody with an interest in cinema. I’m sure they’ll have photos or recordings of the night up soon, but I thought I’d give my own impressions.

Anything but Depraved...

I didn’t take notes. I was sitting in the front row and I figured it would have been rude to be jotting down notes while Cronenberg was talking. I’ve had the pleasure of seeing various other directors under similar circumstances – David Lynch and Neil Jordan among them – so I was quite surprised at how at ease Cronenberg was with the crowd, being interviewed. In a sharp suit, he was often smiling pleasantly and often speaking candidly about various aspects of his productions and plans – he was very much in his element.

I have to admit to being somewhat surprised on seeing him. From looking at his blood-drenched filmography – “the baron of blood” is an accurate nickname, he conceded, but argued that nobody on the planet (except “just that one guy” on the Internet Movie Database) ever called him “Depraved Dave” or “Dave Deprave” – one would be forgiven for expecting a morbid autuer, somebody who speaks in muttered sentences and gives cryptic answers while refusing to offer any insight that might remove their work of some of its abstract charm.

Instead, Cronenberg launched straight into the evening by talking about his most recent missed opportunity – an adaptation of a Robert Ludlum novel that was to star Denzel Washington and Tom Cruise to be financed by MGM. Of course, MGM fell apart and it’s not happening, but he spoke very frankly about the film. He observed that Ludlum was “a terrible writer” from the point of view of adapting his work, but admitted it was oddly liberating – there’s something nice about the freedom it gives to those translating his books to screen.

Translation was a key word there. Describing the filming the unfilmable Naked Lunch (“It is unfilmable,” David Fanning stressed), Cronenberg felt that ‘adapting’ was an unsuitable word. It was more like a translation from one medium to another – as if translating a language. He did add an important caveat, warning “there’s no dictionary for that translation”. He spoke about The Dead Zone as being the perfect example, claiming that the fans of Stephen King’s original book were extremely pleased, even though he admitted drastically altering the material. Later on, he suggested that A History of Violence was based “on a terrible graphic novel”.

His role in and outside the mainstream came up. He didn’t scoff and feign disinterest – though he did stress he doesn’t make films for Oscars – in fact suggesting he would take great pleasure in making a bug budget film. In fact, with smaller independent studios shutting down, it’s easier to get bigger films made – ironically enough. He discussed how the genre shift recently in his work – between Spider and A History of Violence – was one driven by economic necessity. He confirmed the urban myth that we’d heard that none of the cast or crew got paid – “we had $8m for a $10m film,” he summed up – and admitted that his next project was one he wanted to get paid for.

Remarking on the possibility of working with the big studios, he conceded that “there’s a penalty to pay”, with network notes and the interference from suits, but expressed a sincere interest in making a big budget film. When Fanning suggested that he’d appreciate the high-tech toys and advanced technology that such money would afford, the director surprisingly singled out Tom Cruise as perhaps the most interesting component to work with on a big budget film. Cruise is a “creature of Hollywood”, completely different to anyone he has ever worked with, though he did single out Cruise’s professionalism and work ethic, something that I’ve heard quite a few directors agree with him on.

Cronenberg discussed his organic use of actors, and eschewed the use of storyboards as a film-making device. Indeed, he offered a wonderful story of how he literally got a twenty minute school in the usage of the camera before he was out making films. He praised his actors, including Jeremy Irons (apparently they both agree he should have won the Oscar for Dead Ringers) and Viggo Mortensen (they both share a great amount of trust) – though he cited Patrick McGoohan as “a very talented actor, but a very difficult person” while working on Scanners. He discussed how he believed that storyboarding too rigidly harmed the capacity of actors to contribute to a film, citing their “physicality”. “Their body is their instrument,” he explained. Storyboards create an inorganic barrier which prevents the sort of physical improvisation that directors and actors should thrive on.

He shared a few war stories, including a recent attempt to create a television show based off Dead Ringers to pick up on the success of Nip/Tuck, but the network executives kept chipping away “bit by bit” until there was nothing left. There is a similar story concerning Scanners. He joked about the more recent Oscar-winning Crash and shared an humourous story about a local councilor in England with the unlikely name of John Bull trying to ban his own Crash, as it encouraged “road rage”. Indeed, that film must have caused a fair bit of headache, as he recalled trimming ten minutes of film for the “Blockbuster version” in order to convince Blockbuster Video to rent the video. And that says nothing of Ted Turner’s attempts to edit the film “with a tomahawk” in the belief the film would encourage teens to have sex in cars.

Beyond that, he talked for a bit about his own concept of evolution and how that theme plays through in his work – he denied Fanning’s assertion that his back catalog can be broken into groups demonstrating a clear developing theme. He suggested that humanity is changing dramatically to the point where we are incredibly distinct from even the humans who lived a thousand years ago. To visit Ancient Greece, he suggested, would be to be “among aliens”, with completely different “body language and that sort of thing”.

Regarding plans for the future, Cronenberg was fairly open. He explained that he had found himself in the odd position of being asked to remake The Fly. “To remake my own remake,” was how he phrased it. He was working on the script – but he informed the audience that his script was not a tired remake (or “more of the same”, which is what Mel Brooks had demanded before Cronenberg left the sequel to the eighties classic). Instead, Cronenberg is drafting a script based upon his own original idea – back in the eighties – for a sequel to the cult movie. It was vetoed then, but it looks like the studios might be interested now.

He is also working on The Talking Cure, they are flying over to make it shortly (although he joked that things might not entirely work out and he would just be “visiting” the film location). He outlined the plot – a romantic triangle between Freud, Jung and a former patient – and confirmed that Waltz had been in talks to play Freud before Hollywood came calling. Viggo Mortensen had stepped in at the last minute. “Waltz waltzed off,” Cronenberg punned, adding that “Christain Bale baled.” There wasn’t a hint of begrudgery in his voice. In fact, Cronenberg seems like a man who won’t let any of the incredible hurdles he’s faced as a filmmaker wear him down – there isn’t the faintest suggestion of any lingering bitterness. “I don’t look backwards,” he responded, smiling, when asked what he makes of the gradual change in the tone of his work.

One final hint was given. Cosmopolis is still planned, albeit on the back-burner. Though Cronenberg did suggest that Colin Farrell may be interested in playing the lead part. Colour me interested. Then again, it’s a David Cronenberg film, so colour me interested regardless.

It was a great evening. I’ve only really scratched the surface and touched on the main points. I’m sorry I don’t have more quotes – but hopefully the recordings will be up on the Phil site, or broadcast on Dave Fanning’s show soon. I’d like to thank the Phil for having me for an excellent and insightful evening.

Now for a Cronenberg marathon.

11 Responses

  1. Hey Darren, thank you very much! It’s fair to say that any
    of us who win the prize will be deserver!

    It will be a pleasure to take a picture of five of us, together! Unfortunitely, only Edu is going, but I’ll feel myself represented by him. =o)

    Good luck for all of us!

  2. That right there is gonna be an awesome marathon and I am super jealous you got to go to this. Cronenberg’s one cool dude, need to revisit his stuff as well. Wish I went to stuff like this. Freakin’ Ireland…why do you have to be so awesome.

    • Yep, I’ve been lucky with my college stuff. It’s great to see some of the people like that talking in person. The most interesting person I’ve had the pleasure to be involved with hosting at Trinity is James Cromwell – the man is the very personification of frank, there’s no nonsense or pandering, just the way he sees the world.

      Of course I’m horrendously jealous of my girlfriend who got to take Al Pacino to dinner.

  3. sounds like a good night. Cromwell is a legend

  4. A bit worried – when he made the joke about The Talking Cure possibly not happening, he was just exaggerating the fact that he’s having trouble getting movies off the ground, right? I mean, TC is for sure happening?

    • I imagine he was just joking about the long list of difficulties he had getting movies made – over the course of the night he talked about the lost year he spent on Total Recall, only to be told they wanted “Raiders of the Lost Ark go to Mars”. He does seem very committed to getting this movie made.

      • Everything seems to be set, so I hope this doesn’t fall through. Did he happen to mention the size of the three main roles?

      • I’m afraid not – he really just gave the broad strokes on his three next projects – all of which are, as any Cronenberg fan knows, subject to radical change. That was really the tail end of the interview, he literally just listed the movies coming up and gave us little bits of information on them. The Fly sequel/remake thing was the most expounded upon because I think that was the subject which got him talking about his upcoming slate (someone asked about the remake of The Brood that was planned).

  5. Well I sure don’t like what he did to DeLilo’s novel.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: