I was thrilled to be asked back to join The Pensky Podcast to discuss Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. I joined Wes as their coverage of the fifth season winds down, discussing the Maquis- and Michael-Eddington-centric Blaze of Glory.
I’ve talked before about how the fifth season of Deep Space Nine might be the best season of Star Trek ever produced. As a result, a lot of the really great episodes in the season tend to get a bit of a short shrift when we talk about them, overshadowed by the bigger and even better episodes around them. Blaze of Glory is one of those episodes that is often overlooked, wrapping up several recurring plot threads so the show can focus on its priorities going forward.
This was a fun discussion. Wes and I talk about the episode, about the Maquis, about Sisko’s arc, about tomatoes, about what Eddington really used the cloaking devices for, and about proper seasoning. All very important, totally relevant stuff.
You can find more from The Pensky Podcast here, and listen to the podcast by clicking the link or just listening below.
You might be interested in our reviews of the fifth season of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine:
- Apocalypse Rising
- The Ship
- Looking for Par’Mach in All the Wrong Places
- … Nor the Battle to the Strong
- The Assignment
- Trials and Tribble-ations
- Let He Who is Without Sin
- Things Past
- The Ascent
- Supplemental: The Pensky Podcast – Season 5, Episode 9
- Rapture
- The Darkness and the Light
- The Begotten
- For the Uniform
- In Purgatory’s Shadow
- By Inferno’s Light
- Doctor Bashir, I Presume
- A Simple Investigation
- Business as Usual
- Ties of Blood and Water
- Ferengi Love Songs
- Soldiers of the Empire
- Children of Time
- Blaze of Glory
- Supplemental: The Pensky Podcast – Season 5, Episode 23
- Empok Nor
- In the Cards
- Call to Arms
Filed under: Deep Space Nine, Podcasts! | Tagged: Benjamin Sisko, michael eddington, Sisko, star trek, star trek: deep space nine |
I think your analysis of Sisko and Eddington’s relationship is astute. Eddington gets under Sisko’s skin because deep down he might see Eddington’s points as a little bit valid.