• Following Us

  • Categories

  • Check out the Archives

  • Of Interest…

    spectre15 spotlight7 macbeth8 pan9 thewalk6 themartian10 theintern6 legend9 life7 hitmanagent47h meandearlandthedyinggirl9 manfromuncle7 fantasticfour18 mi5i pixels8 antman15 terminatorgenesys9 loveandmercy9 slowwest6 entourage8 jurassicworld11 madmax-furyroad9 focus9
  • Awards & Nominations

Non-Review Review: Wall Street

It’s interesting that Wall Street, a movie set in the time that it was made, begins with a titlecard reminding the audience that it’s 1985. Maybe it’s because director Oliver Stone realised that the movie would be dated almost as swiftly as it had been released – financial services are very much a product of their time, anchored in a specific moment. “By four o’clock, I’m a dinosaur!” one character exclaims over the phone as he tries to get information – information that will be redundant if he waits too long. However, I don’t think Wall Street is in anyway redundant. The current financial crisis suggests that – if anything – the original film is as relevant now as when it was released (and is the only reason I am not flat-out dreading the release of Wall Steet: Money Never Sleeps). No, I think that it is because, even in the midst of the decade that it was produced, Stone could see the movie would perfectly capture that moment in time. Seriously, despite the fact that its core ideas are as insightful as they were twenty-five years ago, the movie itself feels like the pure essence of the eighties distilled into a two-hour film. That titlecard isn’t there to remind viewers that this is a dated film, it serves as a stamp or a label. Not to say “this is set in 1985”, but “this is 1985″.

Gordon takes stock...

Continue reading


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,858 other followers