About these ads
  • Following Us

  • Categories

  • Check out the Archives

  • Of Interest…

    unbroken6 thehobbit-battleofthefivearmies12 exodus-godsandkings8 interstellar16 nightcrawler9 furye gonegirl9 theequaliser7 sincity-adametokillfor8 ifistay6 intothestorm7 howtotrainyourdragon2g jerseyboys1a xmen-daysoffuturepast3 theamazingspiderman2q rio2e captainamerica-thewintersoldier14
  • Awards & Nominations

Saw Franchise Dies a Painful Death…

What makes this particular painful about this story is that they’ve caused all the fuss over director Kevin Greutert over what is essentially a lame duck film. You could make the case that the writing’s been on the wall for the Saw franchise since the second movie which began a steep decline into ridiculous torture porn (so I enjoyed the first one, so sue me) or even since the last one which underperformed financially. Which is tough to do on a film that has a budget of your average 1970s Doctor Who serial, to be frank. Anyway, despite the seemingly large investment that making Saw VII in 3D would seem to represent (even crappy 3D ain’t cheap), it looks like Lionsgate are calling it a day. Saw VII will be the last of the franchise.

Brace (geddit?) yourself...

For those following the news about the seventh movie in the torture porn series, you’ll note that it has had a bumpy history. To say the least. After Saw VI got trounced by Paranormal Activity at Halloween last year, director Kevin Greutert got contracted by Paramount to direct Paranormal Activity 2. When the release date was announced as Halloween 2010, Lionsgate threw a mini hissy fit and drew down the option on Greutert’s contract, forcing him to direct the competing Saw release this year, and effectively forcing him to give up his work with their competitor. Not cool. Not cool at all.

Now it has emerged that the original plan for eight Saw movies has been cut down to seven due to the underperformance of the last installment. I’m still not sure I trust the original assertion that there were only meant to be eight movies, since there was originally meant to be three movies and – before that – originally meant to be one. Since then, the series has taken the first movie’s convoluted twist ending, Tobin Bell’s voice and Donnie Wahlberg’s career, flushed them down some weird sort of super-toilet and produced a ridiculously convoluted narrative about people getting brutally hacked, contorted and snapped.

The news came out in an interview with Patrick Melton, co-writer of the last movie:

I think it’s going to end with Saw VII. I have a very strong feeling its going to end with Saw VII. That’s something we’re debating now. You saw in previous interviews or discussions where we thought Saw VIII would be the last one where we had the first trilogy and the second trilogy and then sort of a grand finale wrapped up in two films. But frankly because Saw VI hasn’t performed as well as we anticipated, the idea is well why make two movies when we can make one really excellent movie that wraps up as best we can? And it’s going to be in 3-D which sort of adds to the spectacle. So if you had to ask me, I don’t own the franchise, nor do I run the studio, but I have a feeling, a strong feeling that it’s going to be Saw VII which will be also known as Endgame. And nothing’s official yet, but that’s where we’re hoping things will go.

Does this represent a shift away from torture porn, which has been so ridiculously influential that it has even hit the indie and arthouse circuits? Tell me Antichrist would be possible without Saw.

Maybe this is a sort of weird realigning of the horror world. I imagine the success of Paranormal Activity, in a way reflecting the breakout hit that the original Saw was, will mean we’ll see a lot more… well, paranormal films. Maybe even replacing the gore and grime of films like Hostel and Last House on the Left. I imagine that the slasher movie in all it’s seedy glory won’t die, but we’ll see a genuine change in the kind of cheap horror films produced.

On the other hand, Saw VII could do the business. Yes, it has a director who really couldn’t care less about it and it also follows a box office failure which suggests that audiences may have lost their faith in the ridiculously pointless narrative. But it is in shiny 3D. And 3D films – no matter how dire – typically perform. Because we’re looking for visceral thrills and 3D will provide them. That’s part of the reason that some people suggested that The Final Destination might have had more impact that Avatar. Of course, the box office has shown them, but still…

Maybe the Saw franchise will prove to be as undead as Tobin Bell’s character.

7 Responses

  1. Never apologize for liking the first Saw film. That was a good flick because it wasn’t torture porn… it was a psycholgical thriller and a damn good one!

    • Amen on that. I think there was a lot of love for that film when it first came out, but I think the sequels have tarnished it, quite a bit to be honest.

  2. Absolutely! The 2nd one wasn’t horrible… I use that term loosely. I liked the twist ending but nothing to say about the rest. I mean the killers been dead for like 4 movies. What the hell? Sad thing is, the guys that wrote the 1rst one also wrote the second one and they deviated from their formula… they maintained the story twist but upped the carnage. That just sent things into a tailspin!
    Dig the site by the way… keep it up!

  3. Shut the fuck up you fucking ignoramus. Torture porn? Most of us don’t jack off to Saw films…most of us. I only jack off to regular porn. This is not porn…the plot may be too thick for your dull, self-absorbed brain but I am smarter than you.

    • I see what you did there! Hi-oo! I said “porn”, so I must mean erotica, which I clearly can’t comprehend or use in the right context. Of course, the notion that the word pornography might have more than one meaning is just crazy. Best tell those dictionary people, because they’re just keeping ignoramuses like me in business:

      por·nog·ra·phy (pôr-ngr-f)
      n.
      1. Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.
      2. The presentation or production of this material.
      3. Lurid or sensational material: “Recent novels about the Holocaust have kept Hitler well offstage [so as] to avoid the … pornography of the era” (Morris Dickstein).

      I think the torture subgenre (and the later movies in the Saw franchise) fit into the third category. Yes, they have a plot about Jigsaw and his replacements, but actual porn also has plots about like repair men and dodgy plumbing.

      • I meant torture porn… that’s what they call it! It’s used by established movie critics. What’s with the harsh words Allister… Geez!
        Has nothing to do with being turned on… it means to sensationalize the violence as one would do with sex in pornography!

      • I think I might have been a bit harsh in replying there, apologies Kai and Allister, but Kai is right, it’s a term used throught the industry and among film circles (and outside them). If I said torture porn to my non-cinema-regular-attending mates, they’d know what I was talking about.

        And I really enjoyed the first Saw film.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 6,690 other followers

%d bloggers like this: